“Read my cheeks: We want to pay taxes, ” Chris Lehane, Airbnb’s world head of public policy, told the nation’s mayors in 2016. In its first year since, the home-sharing site has echoed written declaration in press releases, op-eds, emails, and on billboards. On its website, Airbnb says it is “democratizing revenue by engender tens of millions of brand-new levy dollars for governments all over the world.”

But when Palm Beach County, Florida, a popular tourist destination, progressed an ordinance in October 2018 involving Airbnb and other short-term rental companies to collect and pay the county’s 6 percentage tenancy charge on trips arranged through their sites, Airbnb sued.

Palm Beach County imposition collector Anne Gannon wasn’t caught. “We knew we were going to get indicted, ” she says. “That’s what they do around the country. It’s their mode of operation.”

Gannon has been luring, peril, and succession Airbnb to collect taxes for its emcees since 2014. Five times, three lawsuits, and millions of people around unpaid residence taxes later, she’s still trying. “All we want them to do is pay their taxes, ” she says. “They absolutely don’t want to pay their taxes the mode we want to collect them. That’s the bottom line.”

Similar dramas are playing out all over the country. From Nashville to New Orleans to Honolulu, Airbnb is combating local officials over requests to collect occupancy taxes and ensure that the assets listed on its site comply with zoning and safety rulers. In the past five months alone, the company has depleted nearly$ 1 million to quash regulations in San Diego and has litigated Boston, Miami, and Palm Beach County over regional regulations that require Airbnb to collect taxes or remove illegal directories. Abroad, Airbnb has fought city officials over regulations aimed at preventing residences from being transformed into de facto hotels and askings from duty powers for more specific data about legions and visits.

Airbnb is engaged in “a city-by-city, block-by-block guerrilla war” against local government, says Ulrik Binzer, CEO of Host Compliance, which aids cities sketch and enforce rules for short-term rentals, sometimes putting it at odds with hosting platforms. “They required to virtually defended every one of these clashes like it is the most important battle they have.”

Founded in 2008 as an early endorse of the sharing economy by allowing people to rent homes, apartments, and rooms to others, Airbnb has grown into a lodging colossus, give more than 6 million locates to stay in more than 191 countries. Its itemizes outnumber the interests of the top six hotel chains combined, helping the company reportedly make more than$ 1 billion in income in the third quarter of 2018. It is valued by investors at $31 billion, originating it the country’s second most valuable startup, after Uber. By comparison, Hilton and Marriott’s current market capitalizations are $25 billion and $43 billion, respectively. Earlier this month, Airbnb acquired last-minute hotel reserve work HotelTonight, reportedly for more than $ 400 million.

One reason Airbnb is often a cheap alternative for travelers: Ranging a inn or bed and breakfast is expensive; snarling photographs of your dwelling, accommodation, or give office and crowding out an online profile is not. Hotels must comply with a litany of health, safety, and zoning rules–as well as register with local agencies and agree to collect sure-fire taxes–before they can volume a single guest.

Airbnb maintains that, in most cases, it’s not responsible for collecting occupancy taxes are necessary to hotels and other cottages or for to secure the chambers and residences listed on its places comply with zoning or state regulations. The busines says it follows local and state statutes but is considered to be a “platform, ” serving merely to connect hosts and tourists, rather than a housing provider–more akin to Facebook than Marriott.

The onus is on legions, Airbnb indicates, to collect and pay any relevant taxes and to comply with other regulations. In practice, though, few actually do–at least not without appreciable campaign by local authorities–according to interviews with more than a dozen local government officials and advisers.

Some officials agree with Airbnb. In an early 2018 inspection of state tax departments by Bloomberg, officials in 25 positions said it was the host’s responsibility to pay occupancy tax for an Airbnb stay. Officials in 14 commonwealths said they consider it the responsibility of Airbnb or other short-term rental operators. The cross-examine was made before the US Supreme Court regulated in June that states may obtain sales tax from online retailers even when they don’t have a physical attendance in that regime. The investigation did not include local authorities, who are often more reliant on revenue from occupancy taxes, particularly in favourite tourist areas.

To be sure, these aren’t Airbnb’s taxes, any more than Hilton “pays” taxes for its guests’ hotel bides. Very, the officials sparring with Airbnb crave the company to collect and forward the taxes from patrons, much as hotels do. Airbnb says it isn’t required to collect the taxes in countless locates; early on, it principally didn’t.

That changed around 2014, when Airbnb began disturbing deals with officials in hand-picked municipals to collect and deliver taxes from its multitudes. It calls these Voluntary Collection Agreements, or VCAs. In Portland, site of the first agreement, city officials legalized home-sharing and lowered the registration fee for short-term rentals around the same time Airbnb agreed to add a 11.5 percentage tenancy tariff on each booking. It later negotiated similar spates in San Francisco, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and elsewhere. The firm says it has signed more than 350 such agreements nationwide and more than 500 various regions of the world, and has compiled more than $ 1 billion in taxes.

“Some governments have settles asking scaffolds like Airbnb to collect and remit taxes, and we perform every attempt to comply with these obligations, ” says Christopher Nulty, Airbnb’s head of public policy. “However, many governments do not have such rules and so Airbnb has proactively substantiated more than 500 voluntary collect agreements globally to ensure our community is paying their fair share of taxes.”

However, those agreements don’t require hosts to meet other zoning, health, and security settles, and they proscribe metropolis from attempting to collect back taxes. Some too create obstacles for neighbourhood agencies to identify and police multitudes who listing through the site. Dan Bucks, onetime conductor of the Montana Department of Revenue and former executive director of the US Multistate Tax Commission, analyzed some of the few publicly available Airbnb agreements and found that most foreclosed metropolitan officials from learning the specifies or homes of Airbnb hosts, performing it impossible for officials to enforce neighbourhood systems. Horses says the agreements facilitated Airbnb grow by “providing a shield of secrecy” to hosts. His study was partially funded by the American Hotel and Lodging Association, which is often at odds with Airbnb and other short-term rental companies.

Airbnb says its VCAs are designed to help government agencies compile tax revenue , not to help them enforce other laws related to short-term rentals. The company says the agreements show that it is a responsible corporate citizen.

Historically, other online rental assistances, such as Booking.com, HomeAway, and VRBO, have not collected these taxes in countless arranges. In the past two years, HomeAway and VRBO have been initiated collecting some occupancy taxes in a handful of areas–sometimes utilize their own version of a VCA. Booking.com does not proposal any occupancy-tax collection services, deepening the revenue drain for metropolis. Booking.com’s world-wide communications director, Kim Soward, says the company monies all required taxes. Expedia Group–owner of HomeAway, VRBO, VacationRentals, and other sites–did not respond to numerou requests for comment.

Airbnb is the undeniable monstrous of the field, and is reportedly preparing for an initial public offering. About 51 percentage of all short-term rental indices in the US are on Airbnb, according to an analysis by Binzer, of Host Compliance. VRBO sovereignties 17 percent of inventories and HomeAway 11 percentage, he says.

Poster Child

New Orleans was acclaimed as the poster child for Airbnb’s work with local governments after ratifying a VCA in December 2016. Around the same time, the city struck a deal with Airbnb to legalize short-term rentals while soliciting that the company share the names and addresses of legions, prohibit particular illegal schedules, and create an online system that automatically registers emcees with the city, among other things. Many considered the distribute as a signed Airbnb was learning to live with neighbourhood taxes and regulations.

Today, municipal officials say they’re thwarted. They say a surge in short-term rentals has exacerbated New Orleans’ affordable house crunch and turned part suburban blocks into de facto hotels. Jane &# x27; s Place Neighborhood Sustainability Initiative, a local building radical, says there were 4,319 whole-unit Airbnb rolls in the city last year, more than double the 1,764 in 2015. The group found that 11 percentage of motorists, including numerous from outside Louisiana, domination 42 percent of the city’s short-term rentals.

The largest hustler, a company announced Sonder, has 197 short-term rental lets. Roughly 80 percent of Sonder’s directories are booked through stages like Airbnb, according to Sonder’s director of communications, Mason Harrison. “That’s a different story than the mom-and-pop” narrative that Airbnb often uses to describe its legions, says New Orleans councilmember Kristin Gisleson Palmer.

City officials say the registration system Airbnb launched in April 2017 didn’t give them some data they had requested, such as the identity of the property owner or tenant, the number of bedrooms in the quality, and contact information for the asset overseer. To compile the missing data, metropoli staffers say they had to contact 4,786 entrants over 3 month. “We could not really effectively use[ the information provided] for enforcement and maintaining folks accountable, ” Palmer says.

In May 2018, the city council foisted a nine-month freeze in some areas on new grants for leasing a home without an owner present. The following month, Airbnb disabled the enrollment system–including another enforcement-enabling feature, which displayed hosts’ license multitudes on their Airbnb listings.

A February 15 report by the city’s Department of Safety and Admit, obtained by WIRED, states that disabling the enrollment structure generated a year of undertaking by municipal officials tracking short-term rentals to “disappear overnight.” The report concludes that Airbnb and other short-term rental firms had engaged in “deliberate data obfuscation, refusal to provide the required data, and a total failure of cooperation with any enforcement mechanisms pursued by the City.” The report notes that Airbnb continues to collect and remit tenancy taxes for its listings in the city.

Airbnb says metropoli officials’ description of occurrences is “inaccurate, ” and that it is supplying all the information that is required. The firm says there were “initial bumps in the road that Airbnb was working with the city to address, exclusively to have lawmakers abruptly deepen relevant rules in May 2018. ” Those deepens, the company says, uttered the enrollment arrangement ineffective.

“Housing affordability is a challenge in New Orleans–in fact 70 percent of our multitude parish have said they rely on the income they start to stay in their homes, ” Airbnb says. The busines says it is committed to working with officials to resolve any concerns.

A February report by the New Orleans Department of Safety and Admit is critical of short-term rental corporations .

Blocking New Laws

Airbnb says it complies with laws that require it to collect and pay taxes for emcees. But it has also worked to forestall such laws–even seek at times to strip cities of authority over short-term rentals. That’s what happened in Nashville in late 2017 and early 2018.

As the city inched closer to prohibiting so-called “mini hotels”–non-owner-occupied homes used exclusively as vacation rentals–Airbnb shifted its focus from City Hall to the state Capitol three blocks away. In the latter half of 2017, the company more than double-dealing the number of lobbyists it employed in Tennessee, to from four to 11, and expended between $225,000 and $350,000 on lobbying between February 2017 and August 2018, according to reports the company filed with the state.

In January 2018, the Tennessee Department of Revenue signed a VCA with Airbnb. The agreement requires Airbnb to collect and paying off 7 percentage state sales tax on its bookings, but does not cover the 5 percent residence charge in Nashville, by far its largest market in the government. A few days later, Nashville passed its ordinance prohibiting mini hotels.

Around this time, a political action committee called the Committee to Expand Middle Class By Airbnb, Inc. given $10,000 to groups representing Tennessee Republican, according to campaign finance records. The donations included $2,500 to the campaign of state representative Cameron Sexton, who had introduced a legislation in 2017 specifying that short-term rentals should not be considered hotels under mood regulation. The invoice, known as the Short-Term Rental Unit Act, was drafted in consultation with Airbnb and other short-term rental firms, including HomeAway, according to the Tennessean . It included a provision stripping cities of the power to ban existing short-term rentals. The Tennessee General Assembly passed the money in April 2018.

Local partisans say the law cripples cities’ ability to tackle an important regional controversy. “The Tennessee state Legislature and Tennessee &# x27; s governor making a decision gravely undermined the basic armours for the state, refuge, and well-being of Nashvillians that were created by our local government, ” John Stern, president of the Nashville Neighborhood Alliance, a residents’ group, says via email.

Airbnb says the Tennessee law was the work of “state lawmakers who care deeply about this issue and worked to organize a vast organization of supporters–including the business, technology, property rights, and home sharing communities.” Sexton did not return a request for comment.

Similar scenarios have narrated elsewhere after metropolitans have moved to restrict short-term rentals. In February 2016, the Austin City Council voted to phase out mini inns in residential district by 2022. In the following months, various other Texas metropolitans overstepped similar regulations. Then, early in 2017, Texas state lawmakers interposed two invoices in the legislature preventing municipalities from boycotting short-term rentals and enforcing many regulations.

A few months later, in April 2017, Airbnb announced that it had signed a VCA with Texas officials to collect state occupancy taxes. Bennett Sandlin, executive director of the Texas Municipal League, which represents cities, called the deal “a smokescreen to cover the company’s refusal to pay taxes.” The 2017 bills eventually stopped in the Texas legislature, but lawmakers plan to try again this year.

Airbnb says it has “excellent working relationships” with numerous Texas municipals and hopes to extend the VCA with the country to “new tax agreements with Texas municipalities be used to help muster new revenue from home sharing.”

Where’s the Money?

Gannon, the Palm Beach tax collector, has been tilting at roam companionships for a decade. In 2009, she sued Expedia, Orbitz, Priceline, and Travelocity for failing to collect and compensate tenancy taxes on the total costs of the hotel rooms they were selling; three years later, the companies settled the dres and agreed to pay roughly$ two million in back taxes.

She then turned to the online home-rental companies. In 2014, she indicted Airbnb, HomeAway, and TripAdvisor, alleging they should be classified as “dealers” renting adaptations under Florida law, and thus required to collect occupancy taxes on behalf of the members of their legions. In January, after five years old, a gues is of the view that the services were not pushers under Florida law and did not have to collect the taxes for multitudes. Gannon is appealing the find.

In 2015, the Florida Department of Revenue signed a VCA authorizing Airbnb to collect and remit the 6 percentage nuisance tax for all itemizes in the position, plus local marketings and tenancy taxes for some counties.

Soon after, Gannon asked to see the details of the agreement; state officials told her it was confidential. So she sued the Florida Department of Revenue, alleging that the agency’s secrecy transgressed the state’s public records regulation. A few hours later, government departments faxed a copy of its Airbnb VCA to Gannon’s office; she says she was instructed not to share it with anyone. It expected Airbnb to provide the government exclusively with aggregate data and allowed the company to withhold “any personally identifiable information” about emcees or patrons. Most other VCAs signed with state or local governments contain identical language.

Officials say such more detailed information on multitudes and their rentals are crucial to enforcing neighbourhood laws and ensuring the lump sum tax remittances match up with detailed data on keeps. Shielding figures and other details from duty officials “is a gross departure from standard practice, ” says Bucks, the former excise commissioner.

In New Orleans, the February report by the city’s Department of Safety and Permit says Airbnb furnished officials there with anonymous detail lists in place of addresses or taxpayer identifiers, making it difficult for the city to review the information. “It is impossible to move whether we are getting all the money that we are supposed to get, ” says Andrew Sullivan, joint chiefs of staff for Palmer, the New Orleans councilmember.

Airbnb dissents. “Airbnb provides the necessary information to ensure excise payments are accurate, including number of lights, bills, and the amount of tax accumulated, ” Nulty says. He says the company appreciates investigations; however, many of the company’s VCAs prohibit metropolitans from reviewing Airbnb more than once every two years.

Airbnb &# x27; s 2016 VCA with Sonoma County, California .

A Public Clash

Palm Beach County’s monthly commissioners satisfying is commonly a gloomy thing. But October 16, 2018, was different.

The enclosures were parcelled with people dressed in white-hot, regarding red-hot pink flyers. The conclude: Gannon’s proposal to amend the county’s Tourist Development Ordinance to require platforms such as Airbnb to collect and remit occupancy taxes on behalf of the members of hosts, and to share more data with the county.

A few weeks earlier, emails from Airbnb had arrived in the inboxes of its hosts in the district. “Home-sharing in Palm Beach County is under attack, ” many declared in bold notes, asserting that Gannon had proposed an “unfriendly” ordinance that they are able to acquire hosts’ lives more difficult. The emails pled legions to attend the hearing and “use your spokesperson to oppose this proposal and share the benefits” of dwelling sharing.

Around 100 hosts attended the meeting. But Gannon was prepared. Having seen several of the emails, she assembled a three-page document rebutting what she announces Airbnb’s “campaign of misinformation, ” line by line. The container was printed on hot pink paper and given to each person who moved through the door.

During the gather, some legions expressed doubts about Airbnb’s position. Some withdrawn ascertaining a message from Airbnb stating that it was collecting and remitting taxes on their rentals, though the company was not. “I have this underlying fear … that I am ending a rule that I don’t actually only knew, ” said Ruth Riegelhaupt-Herzig, an Airbnb host since 2015.

“We guessed Airbnb took care of everything, and I is rather scared I was in trouble with the government, ” host Maria Vale said at the meeting. “All I’m saying is we’re the middle–the hosts are stuck in the middle.”

Nulty says that Airbnb utters it clear to hosts which taxes it collects via this webpage, which directories areas with VCAs and what taxes they cover. The page does not explain which taxes hosts are required to collect on their own. A different Airbnb page advises emcees to tell patrons to bring extra money when checking in so the multitude can muster taxes in person. Riegelhaupt-Herzig says that isn’t effective, as most patrons are attentive of an additional 6 or 10 percent instantly to the host, in addition to the booking freights they paid online through Airbnb.

What’s more, all stays booked in the area have a charge labeled “Occupancy Taxes and Fees” added to the final statement, because of the state’s VCA. “So for us to turn around and say,’ I’m sorry, you haven’t paid the residence taxation in Palm Beach County, ’ they think we’re scamming them, ” which isn’t good for a reviews-based business, Riegelhaupt-Herzig told WIRED. She says she has been paying the county tenancy excise since October out of her own pocket.

Screenshot of the verification for a reserve in Palm Beach County, Florida, establishing tenancy taxes and fees.

Airbnb

After more than an hour of testament , commissioner Dave Kerner said Airbnb had allowed its hosts to “be misled” about taxes. “That is concerning, ” Palm Beach County mayor Melissa McKinlay said. ”And so I will support this ordinance today.” It was approved unanimously seconds later.

In San Diego last year, Airbnb made a different tacking to counter a brand-new constitution. City officials had signed a VCA with Airbnb in 2015. But they originated happy with the setup’s lack of clarity and the inability to audit, says San Diego councilmember Barbara Bry. What’s more, Airbnb use had skyrocketed in San Diego since then. In March 2015, there were more than 2,600 rental cells listed on short-term rental sites in San Diego, according to Host Compliance; by 2019, that total had surged to more than 11,500. Host Compliance says two-thirds of short-term rentals in San Diego are posted on Airbnb. Bry says that the rise of full-time investor-owned short-term rentals in residential district has hurt enrollment in public schools, transformed vicinities into neighborhoods of mini hotels, and contributed to a citywide housing shortage.

Last August, the San Diego City Council guided an ordinance that boycotted the short-term rental of residences that aren’t the owner’s primary palace and necessary stages to collect taxes on behalf of the members of their emcees, effectively overriding their VCA. Bry says she presumed Airbnb would sue, but it didn’t. Within daytimes, Airbnb hurled its weight behind a crusade to overturn the new regulations through a citywide referendum.

Public records indicate Airbnb donated $700,000 to a California political action committee announced “Committee To Expand the Middle Class, Supported by Airbnb, Inc.” That group reported spending $300,000 to hire signature gatherers to run applications resisting the San Diego regulation, and made a $ 300,000 donation to another group behind the referendum motion, “Stand for Jobs, Stop the Vacation Rental Ban.” Airbnb also directly given $276,358 to the second group around the same time, records show.

Four weeks after the city council approved the new settles, representatives of Airbnb, HomeAway, and Stand for Jobs delivered more than 62,000 signatures calling for a referendum to invalidate the existing legislation, roughly twice the count needed to force a citywide vote.

City councilmembers said they didn’t want to risk losing the vote, so they invalidated the existing legislation, with plans to try again. “I’m disappointed that a corporation apparently valued at $31 billion tumbled upon our municipality with its unlimited millions of dollars and used fraudulent tactics to force us to where we are today, ” Bry said during a council meeting on October 22, just before the council elected to vacate its ordinance.

Airbnb says the petitions garnered so many signatures because the ordinance “would have devastated the neighbourhood economy, impacted property rights in every San Diego vicinity, and cost the city millions yearly in tax revenue.”

The San Diego City Council plans to introduce a brand-new short-term rental guide sometime this tumble, Bry told WIRED. If Airbnb challenges a brand-new guide, Bry says municipal officials will be more prepared, and will respond with their own public-education campaign and take the raced ordinance to a public vote.

Airbnb’s engagements with local officials have intensified since last year’s Supreme Court ruling in a case involving online retailers. Some duty professionals say the decision weakens Airbnb’s position that it doesn’t have to collect taxes for its hosts. “There is no doubt whatsoever now that on a constitutional basis Airbnb can be required to collect[ taxes ], ” says Bucks. “There is no justification for these special lots anymore.” Airbnb says it’s monitoring state-by-state proliferations related to the case.

Airbnb’s recent disputes against Palm Beach, Boston, and Miami focus on another aspect of those cities’ rules: specific requirements that scaffolds remove schedules that don’t comply with the law. Airbnb says the relevant requirements are unconstitutional and technologically unfeasible. But the company does remove illegal schedules in its hometown of San Francisco, and is currently conducting periodic or ongoing purges in New Orleans, Santa Monica, Japan, Berlin, Vancouver, and, briefly, New York City . In New York, Airbnb sued to block a city ordinance ask it to turn over more detailed information on directories; a magistrate in January blocked the laws and regulations from taking effect.

In Boston, city councilor Michelle Wu cured pas the push last year for an ordinance aimed at discouraging multitudes from turning apartments and homes into mini inns. The rule compels emcees to register with the city and restricts short-term rentals to owner-occupied parts. “Airbnb describes itself as a quaint little home-sharing busines … but the reality is that it has grown to be a corporate entity that moves millions of dollars from customs taking advantage of openings and operating de facto hotels, ” she says.

On April 17, Airbnb sent emails to thousands of Boston Airbnb users praising Wu. The email claimed that she was aligned with “big hotel interests” and falsely said she intended to place a “restrictive 30 -day cap on unhosted stays.” Wu says Airbnb never sought to discuss the ordinance or check the claims in the email. Airbnb says Wu’s proposal was “anti-tenant, anti-middle class, ” and “overly restrictive.”

The ordinance guided in June. Four months later, Airbnb sued the city, alleging the rules–which enters into force January 1–violate state and federal ordinances. Wu says the city modeled its rule after San Francisco &# x27; s, which Airbnb complies with. The Boston lawsuit–much like others recently filed by Airbnb–only challenges requirements that stages remove illegal itemizes and share information with local officials to aid enforcement. The clothing seeks an ruling against parts of the law, and the city has agreed not to enforce those sections until a referee rules.

A few weeks after Airbnb indicted Boston, Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker ratified legislation to tax and settle short-term rentals at both the commonwealth and local levels. The statute, which goes into effect in July, necessitates emcees to register with the regime. Datum about hosts–minus specific mansion numbers–will be displayed on a publicly available registry, and multitudes who rolled multiple rentals must pay added taxes. Airbnb says the law will “jeopardize personal privacy of our emcees while targeting significant and unnecessary burdens” on them. The firm says it is working with state officials to address those concerns.

Airbnb’s borough dissensions have been a boon for Binzer, whose companionship Host Compliance has been working with 150 metropolitans to identify short-term rental owners skirting taxes and regulations and to bequeath an imposition approach without astonishing deals with Airbnb. He used to be an occasional Airbnb host himself–and paid residence taxes–when he lived in Tiburon, California; then he was tapped to help local officials quantify Airbnb’s business in city. He says metropolitans are often overmatched by Airbnb, in part because the company sporadically nips the website in ways that impede tax collectors and enforcement agencies.

For example, Binzer says that until December 2016, Airbnb included the street name of a asset in the metadata attached to the listing. Airbnb’s expressions of service prohibit third parties from cleaning its site for this kind of information, but connoisseurs say it’s crucial for enforcement. Officials in some municipals abused this data to identify hidden hosts. Then Airbnb removed the street name, and adjusted the geocoding for itemizes, converting the latitude and longitude so properties was contained in slightly different locations.

“It &# x27; s a cat and mouse game, ” Binzer says. “They literally set the pin in the wrong place of where the actual property is.”

Airbnb says it shields the street name and other personal information related to hosts “to ensure an added level of privacy when third-party scrape sites aim to compile listing information.”

From Negotiation to Litigation

Around the time Palm Beach County Commissioners overstepped the short-term rental tax guide in October, Gannon says she spoke with a representative from Airbnb. She recalls the company swimming a gradual implementation strategy: Airbnb would comply with some of the new rulers immediately, but others–like a organisation necessary legions to be properly registered with tax authorities–would be phased in over time.

Gannon thought that seemed reasonable, as long as Airbnb collected and paid the taxes. But she didn’t have time to see the discussion through. A month and a half after the ordinance was legislated, Airbnb indicted the county. The suit disagrees Airbnb can’t be required to police illegal registers and share host information because “Airbnb is a realization of Congress’s[ free speech] goals” and a “classic intermediary.” It doesn’t question whether the company can be compelled to collect occupancy taxes; Airbnb is not collecting them in the district, though the ordinance went into effect on January 20. HomeAway likewise litigated the district; the dress have since been combined.

“They were just stringing us along until they had their lawsuit ready to file, ” Gannon says. “It’s conventional of Airbnb … They &# x27; re getting ready to issue an IPO and go public.”

Airbnb &# x27; s lawsuit against Palm Beach County, Florida .

Updated 3-21-2019, 5:30 pm EDT: This narrative was updated to clarify the relationship between the American Hotel and Lodging Association and Airbnb, to clarify a characterization of Airbnb’s corporate citizenship, and to add a comment clarifying Airbnb’s position about its cooperation with the city of New Orleans. The updated fib also made very clear that HomeAway was among the companies that helped draft a Tennessee law and that HomeAway has sued Palm Beach County .


Read more: http :// www.wired.com /

Some of the links in this article are "affiliate links", a link with a special tracking code. This means if you click on an affiliate link and purchase the item, we will receive an affiliate commission. The price of the item is the same whether it is an affiliate link or not. Regardless, we only recommend products or services we believe will add value to our readers. By using the affiliate links, you are helping support our Website, and we genuinely appreciate your support.
Please follow and like us: